RDP 2018-07: The GFC Investment Tax Break Appendix B: Extra RD Results

As noted in Section 5, for the RD specification we make a number of choices regarding the bandwidth, kernel, polynomial order and revenue ceiling. Below we show that the results are reasonably robust to these choices.

Figures B1 and B2 show the estimated treatment effects and 95 per cent confidence intervals using polynomials of order 1–4, with differing bandwidths. The results using a linear model are unsurprisingly somewhat sensitive to the choice of bandwidth, though they are not knife edge, as there is a moderate region around $0.2 million where the results are significant. Using higher-order polynomials we also find evidence of a significant treatment effect. These tend to be at higher bandwidths, reflecting the fact that we need a more flexible model once we look at a larger region. Importantly, the point estimates tend to be around 0.5–0.7, as in the baseline model. This gives us confidence that the results are reasonably robust.

Figure B1: RD Treatment Effect
Different bandwidths and polynomial order
Figure B1: RD Treatment Effect

Notes: No covariates; bandwidth is 2007/08 revenue in $ million; dashed lines are 95 per cent confidence intervals

Figure B3 shows the estimated treatment effects and confidence intervals using the same bandwidth as in the baseline model, but with differing ceilings for revenue in 2008/09. Overall, the results are reasonably robust to this choice, as long as the ceiling is not set very low.

Figure B2: RD Treatment Effect
Different bandwidths and polynomial order
Figure B2: RD Treatment Effect

Notes: Notes: Includes revenue in 2008/09 and 2009/10 as covariates; bandwidth is 2007/08 revenue in $ million; dashed lines are 95 per cent confidence intervals

Figure B3: RD Treatment Effect
Different ceiling
Figure B3: RD Treatment Effect

Notes: Bandwidth set at baseline optimal of $0.27 million in 2007/08 revenue; ceiling is 2008/09 revenue in $ million; dashed lines are 95 per cent confidence intervals
(a) Includes revenue in 2008/09 and 2009/10