SECOND STATEMENT ON THE CONDUCT OF MONETARY POLICY
The Treasurer and the Governor of the Reserve Bank
July 2003
This statement records the common understanding of the Governor, as Chairman
of the Reserve Bank Board and the Government on key aspects of Australia's
monetary policy framework. It builds on the 1996 Agreement between the
Treasurer and the Governor on the respective roles and responsibilities
in the operation of monetary policy in Australia.
Monetary policy is a key element of macroeconomic policy and its effective
conduct is critical to Australia's economic performance and prospects.
For this reason, and given the re-appointment of the Governor of the Reserve
Bank, it is appropriate and timely for the Governor and the Government
to reaffirm and update their mutual understanding of the operation of
monetary policy in Australia.
This statement should continue to foster a better understanding, both
in Australia and overseas, of the nature of the relationship between the
Reserve Bank and the Government, the objectives of monetary policy, the
mechanisms for ensuring transparency and accountability in the way policy
is conducted, and the independence of the Bank.
Relationship Between the Reserve Bank and the Government
The Reserve Bank Act 1959 (the Act) gives the Reserve Bank Board
the power to determine the Bank's monetary policy and take the necessary
action to implement policy changes. The Act nominates the Governor as
Chairman of the Board.
The Government recognises the independence of the Bank and its responsibility
for monetary policy matters and intends to respect the Bank's independence
as provided by statute.
Section 11 of the Act prescribes procedures for the resolution of policy
differences between the Reserve Bank Board and the Government. The procedures,
in effect, allow the Government to determine policy in the event of a
material difference; but the procedures are politically demanding and
their nature reinforces the Bank's independence in the conduct of monetary
policy. Safeguards like this ensure that monetary policy is subject to
the checks and balances inherent and necessary in a democratic system.
In addressing the Bank's responsibility for monetary policy the Act provides
that the Board shall, from time to time, inform the Government of the
Bank's policy. Such arrangements are a common and valuable feature of
institutional systems in other countries with independent central banks
and recognise the importance of macroeconomic policy co-ordination.
Consistent with its responsibilities for economic policy as a whole the
Government reserves the right to comment on monetary policy from time
to time.
Objectives of Monetary Policy
The goals of monetary policy are set out in the Act which requires the
Board to conduct monetary policy in a way that, in the Board's opinion,
will best contribute to:
- the stability of the currency of Australia;
- the maintenance of full employment in Australia; and
-
the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia.
The first two objectives lead to the third, and ultimate, objective of
monetary policy and indeed economic policy as a whole. These objectives
allow the Board to focus on price (currency) stability while taking account
of the implications of monetary policy for activity and, therefore, employment
in the short term. Price stability is a crucial precondition for sustained
growth in economic activity and employment.
Both the Bank and the Government agree on the importance of low inflation
and low inflation expectations. These assist businesses in making sound
investment decisions, underpin the creation of new and secure jobs, protect
the savings of Australians and preserve the value of the currency.
In pursuing the goal of medium term price stability, both the Bank and
the Government agree on the objective of keeping consumer price inflation
between 2 and 3 per cent, on average, over the cycle. This formulation
allows for the natural short run variation in inflation over the cycle
while preserving a clearly identifiable benchmark performance over time.
Since the first Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy in 1996 inflation
has averaged 2.4 per cent. The Governor takes this opportunity to express
his continuing commitment to the inflation objective, consistent with
his duties under the Act. For its part the Government indicates again
that it endorses the inflation objective and emphasises the role that
disciplined fiscal policy must play in achieving such an outcome.
Transparency and Accountability
Monetary policy needs to be conducted in an open and forward looking
way. A forward looking focus is essential as policy adjustments affect
activity and inflation with a lag and because of the crucial role of inflation
expectations in shaping actual inflation outcomes. In addition, with a
clearly defined inflation objective, it is important that the Bank continues
to report on how it sees developments in the economy, currently and in
prospect, affecting expected inflation outcomes. These considerations
point to the need for effective transparency and accountability arrangements.
In carrying out the 1996 Agreement, the Reserve Bank has taken steps
to make the conduct of monetary policy more transparent. Changes in monetary
policy and related reasons are now clearly announced and explained. In
addition, the Bank's public commentary on the economic outlook and issues
bearing on monetary policy settings, through public addresses, its quarterly
statements on monetary policy and monthly statistical bulletins, have
been crucial in promoting increased understanding of the conduct of monetary
policy. The Bank will continue to promote public understanding in this
way.
The Governor has also indicated that he plans to continue to be available
to report on the conduct of monetary policy twice a year to the House
of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Finance and Public
Administration.
The Treasurer expresses support for these arrangements, which ensure
the continued transparency and accountability of the Reserve Bank's conduct
of monetary policy and therefore the credibility of policy itself.
The Government and Bank continue to recognise that outcomes, and not
the arrangements underpinning them, will ultimately measure the quality
of the conduct of monetary policy.
|