FINANCIAL STABILITY FORUM
The Financial
Stability Forum was established in 1999 to promote international financial
stability through enhanced information exchange and co-operation in financial
supervision and surveillance. It brings together senior representatives
from international financial institutions, international groupings of
regulators and supervisors, committees of central bank experts and national
authorities responsible for financial stability. The original members were the G7
plus four other countries representing significant financial centres (Australia,
Hong Kong, the Netherlands and Singapore), with Switzerland joining the FSF in early 2007. Australia is represented by
the Governor of the Reserve Bank while other staff – from both the
Reserve Bank and the Australian Treasury – have been involved in
various working groups. The Forum also holds regional meetings to encourage
dialogue between members and non-members. Following each meeting, the
Forum releases a statement
outlining its assessment of vulnerabilities in the global financial system
and a summary of its discussions concerning the international financial
architecture.
The Forum has produced a series of working group studies and reports
on international capital flows, offshore financial centres, highly leveraged
institutions, deposit insurance, the implementation of international financial
standards for sound financial systems, and activity in credit risk transfer
markets (discussed below). Papers on these subjects are available on the
Forum's
website. Work undertaken includes the following:
- The Forum has investigated the activities of highly leveraged institutions,
such as hedge funds. In 2000, a working group, on which the RBA was
represented, recommended a package of measures to address the effects
that highly leveraged institutions activities have on both systemic
risk and market dynamics. These measures included enhanced public disclosure
by highly leveraged institutions, through both regulation and legislation.
A review in 2001 of progress in implementing the recommendations found
some progress had been made (such as improved risk management by counterparties
and better senior management awareness of exposures to highly leveraged
institutions). The review also noted several areas where further action
was required, such as introducing regular and comprehensive stress testing
of potential future credit exposures by those lending to highly leveraged
institutions.
- The Forum has considered the potential for offshore financial centres
to undermine financial stability if inadequately supervised and if information
flows between them and supervisors in other countries are insufficient.
In its 2000 report, the Forum publicly identified a number of offshore
centres that were considered to perform relatively poorly on these criteria.
Since then, the IMF has assumed the task of conducting or supporting
assessments of offshore centres' adherence to relevant standards and
codes.
- The Forum has also been exploring the issues that would arise should
one of the very large and complex financial institutions now present
in the financial landscape encounter serious difficulties. The potential
for such institutions to complicate policy responses was considered
in a study
on consolidation in the financial sector by the G10
countries, as well as Australia and Spain. Both the Reserve Bank and
the Australian Treasury participated. The study, which was published
in January 2001, concluded that existing policies appeared adequate
to contain individual and systemic risks in the intermediate term, but
national authorities were encouraged to step up their contingency planning
for resolving weakness in a large and complex institution in an orderly
way.
- Activity in credit risk transfer markets has also been a focus of
the Forum. Areas that are being investigated by various working groups
on behalf of the Forum include: the types of participants in credit
risk transfer markets; market participants’ understanding of the
risks involved; the possibility of undue concentrations of credit risk;
and the risk management practices employed. The Reserve Bank has participated
in working groups, one of which has produced a study
on credit risk transfer.
Another area of ongoing work relates to the Forum encouraging the implementation
of a Compendium
of Standards that promotes sound financial systems. The standards
cover 'core principles' or 'good practice' in the following areas: transparency
in monetary and financial policies; fiscal transparency; data dissemination;
insolvency; corporate governance; international accounting standards;
international standards on auditing; systemically important payment systems;
money laundering; banking supervision; securities regulation; and insurance
supervision.
Subsequently, the Forum has set out a range of market and official incentives
to encourage the implementation of these standards. Related to this, it
has been recognised that the official community has an important role to
play in facilitating implementation (e.g. through the provision of technical
assistance) and in monitoring, and reporting on, progress – this in
turn providing added encouragement for the effective implementation of standards.
The IMF is co-ordinating monitoring arrangements, working closely with the
World Bank to produce Reports
on the Observance of Standards and Codes, providing assessments of the
extent of compliance by a country with the various standards. Australia’s
self-assessment, prepared by the Australian Treasury, is titled 'Making
Transparency Transparent: An Australian Assessment'.
While assessing compliance with a number of the standards is the main
responsibility of either the IMF or the World Bank, banking supervision,
securities regulation, insurance supervision and payment systems are responsibilities
shared between the two institutions. Assessment of standards in these
areas is normally undertaken as part of the Financial
Sector Assessment Program. These Program assessments are intended
to identify strengths, vulnerabilities and risks in the financial system
in order to determine how key risks and vulnerabilities are being managed,
to establish the sector's developmental and technical assistance needs,
and to help prioritise policy actions. The issues addressed in each Program
are guided by the country's circumstances and reform priorities. Australian
regulators, including the Reserve Bank, have participated in a number
of Financial Sector Assessment Program visits around the world. In October 2006, the IMF released the results of the FSAP for Australia in its Financial System Stability Assessment.
More recently, the FSF has focused on the recent turmoil in financial markets. In particular, it has been identifying the weaknesses underlying the turmoil and recommending actions to strengthen the resilience of key elements of the financial system. In this context, in April 2008, the FSF presented to the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors a report on enhancing the resilience of markets and financial institutions. The FSF will report on progress in June followed by a fuller follow-up report in September. The FSF will continue to closely monitor implementation thereafter.
|